Elena Crippa
Michael Blum, A tribute to Safiye Behar, 2005,
9th Istanbul Biennial
One of the most successful aspects of the 9th Istanbul Biennial was
that many of the artists invited had the opportunity to stay in the
city for extended residencies that ranged from three weeks to three
months in 2005. One of those artists is Michael Blum, who realised his
work for the context of the Deniz Palace Apartments, certainly the most
interesting venue of this year biennial.
Michael Blum's project, A tribute to Safiye Behar,
2005, takes over one of the apartments of the building, transforming
it into a museum to the memory of one of the most extraordinary and
unknown figures of Turkish history, an incredible woman whose past is
rich in intellectual, political and social engagement as much as in
intriguing love affairs. Marxist, feminist, wife and mother, she also
managed to find the time to engage in a long lasting relationship with
Mustapha Kemal, and influence his political views and actions. Born
in 1890 in Istanbul, she only permanently left her native city after
Kemal's death, and rejoined her family in Chicago, where she died aged
75.
The living room, bedroom and studio of her old
home in Istanbul are carefully reconstructed, while visitors can also
re-draw the history of Safiye's life through the family photographs
and letters meticulously arranged into vitrines. As in a proper museum,
a wall text resuming Safiye's life hangs at the entrance, while different
panels present the highlights of her biography and even her family tree.
In the smallest room of the apartment it is also possible to see a video
interview with the nephew of Safiye: 20 minutes with Melik Tutuncu,
2005. If visitors have not yet started to doubt the truthfulness of
the life represented in those rooms, the video interview would certainly
start to inject some suspicion even in the most naïve viewer.
The interview happens in a limo driving around
Chicago, the camera fixed on the supposed nephew of Safiye Behar. Melik
is very talkative and, among other stories, he explains the reason why
he never visited Istanbul. All his family died in a road accident while
visiting Turkey, and it is now emotionally impossible for him to pay
a visit to the country. A very apologetic Michael Blum expresses his
excuses for taking Melik's memory back to such a sad part of his life.
This very dramatic story, if transposed from the reality to the fictional
world, reveals a strong, irresistibly funny and surrealist black humour.
This project works in two major directions. On
one side, it presents the life of a person as a 'ghost' that could influence
the way Turkish people perceive their past and thus their present and
future situation. In Michael Blum's words: "In 2005, as Turkey
and the EU are playing liar's poker about their common future, Safiye
might prove to be a helpful guiding model for current and future generations".1
In this sense, the work functions in a similar way to the project established
in 1999 by Walid Raad, The Atlas Group. On the other side, choosing
a 'typical museum display' as medium, the work explores past solutions
of presentation and investigates further issues related to the transmissibility
of knowledge.
Museums are the products of a pre-modern culture
that we do not share any more. They were conceived in a time when tradition
still had a vital force and an absolute identity existed between the
act of transmission and the thing transmitted. At the same time, during
the last century, museums kept flourishing in an exponential way as
the result of the practice of collecting, which, isolating the object
from its context, is per se an alienating gesture. These issues are
explored in Giorgio Agamben's The man without content, 2 where the author
expresses his belief that modern collectors and artists have been operating
in the same direction, towards the destruction of the transmissibility
of culture. Aesthetic alienation can be considered the point of precarious
settlement of our culture, which is split by a permanent conflict between
past and present. Agamben doubts that it is now possible to settle,
individually and collectively, the split between old and new, re-appropriating
its historicity. At the same time, looking at the writing of Kafka,
Agamben speaks of a work that has renounced to the truth of the content
to address the issue of the very transmissibility, and thus looks at
our concrete context of action and understanding.
Using the setting of the historical house-museum,
Michael Blum creates a microcosm where the various objects and pieces
of information can find their meaning because of sitting next to each
other. In this environment visitors can grasp the limits and the sense
of a small universe, beautifully wrapped inside a flat. This project
has the power to draw us back at a time where you could still think
in terms of universal truths, when artworks were considered original
because of their proximity to the principle that generated them, and
their reason of being was in constructing a space where men could find
certitudes and comfort. The fact that the story of a life told in those
rooms never happened is here not particularly relevant.
The work of Michael Blum operates somehow in
the opposite direction than contemporary habit to quote or collect.
It does not "quote" an object outside a context, depriving
it of its use value and ethical-social significance, but "quotes"
a context, infiltrating into it its own content. The past is not presented
as the object of impenetrable accumulation because the attention is
not on its content or in our ability to recover its truthfulness, but
on the issue of accessing that knowledge as one of the very problematic
tasks of the present cultural condition. A tribute to Safiye Behar explores
the issue and problem of the transmissibility of our own history and
explores man's position as a dweller that moves between past and future,
searching for meanings that he is often unable to recover.
1 www.blumology.net/safiyebehar.html
2 Giogio Agamben, The Melancholy Angel, in The man without content,
Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1999, pages 104-115